Oliver v. Wilts Veneer Co.
This text of 180 N.C. 655 (Oliver v. Wilts Veneer Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Tbe plaintiff wa.s injured while wiping oil off a shaft in tbe veneer plant of defendant, tbe sleeve of bis jumper catching in tbe cogs, causing bis arm to be drawn between tbe cogs and severely mashed.
Tbe motion to nonsuit was properly overruled, there being abundant evidence justifying bis Honor in submitting tbe issues to tbe jury.
There are 56 assignments of error, 39 of them being to tbe evidence and tbe remainder to tbe charge. We think that there is no merit in tbe exceptions to tbe evidence, and that, taking tbe charge as a whole, it is a full, clear, and fair presentation of tbe issues to tbe jury.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
180 N.C. 655, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oliver-v-wilts-veneer-co-nc-1920.