Oliver v. Superior Court

223 P. 558, 193 Cal. 61, 1924 Cal. LEXIS 286
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 25, 1924
DocketS. F. No. 10974.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 223 P. 558 (Oliver v. Superior Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Oliver v. Superior Court, 223 P. 558, 193 Cal. 61, 1924 Cal. LEXIS 286 (Cal. 1924).

Opinion

THE COURT.

This is an application for a writ of mandamus directed to the respondents. An alternative writ was issued by the district court of appeal of the first appellate district, division one, and a peremptory writ denied after hearing, without any written opinion.

Under the rule stated in Burke v. Maze, 10 Cal. App. 206 [101 Pac. 438], we do not grant a transfer unless an error appears upon the face of the opinion. The constitution provides, article VI, section 24, that “In the deter *62 mination of causes all decisions of the supreme court and of the district courts of appeal shall be given in writing and the grounds of the decision shall be stated. ’ ’

This provision applies to mandamus proceedings. (People v. District Court of Appeal, ante, p. 19 [222 Pac. 353].)

The matter is hereby transferred to this court and, in view of the fact that the matter has been considered by the district court of appeal of the first appellate district, division one, the matter is ordered transferred to the district court of appeal of the first appellate district, division one.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Funeral Dirs. Ass'n. v. Bd. of Funeral Dirs. & Embalmers
136 P.2d 785 (California Supreme Court, 1943)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
223 P. 558, 193 Cal. 61, 1924 Cal. LEXIS 286, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oliver-v-superior-court-cal-1924.