Oliver v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Oliver v. State

1928 OK CR 267, 269 P. 508, 40 Okla. Crim. 402, 1928 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 217

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedAugust 4, 1928

DocketNo. A-6148.

StatusPublished

This text of 1928 OK CR 267 (Oliver v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Oliver v. State, 1928 OK CR 267, 269 P. 508, 40 Okla. Crim. 402, 1928 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 217 (Okla. Ct. App. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

EDWARDS, J.

The plaintiff in error was convicted in the district court of Creek county on a charge of manslaughter in the first degree, and was sentenced to serve a term of ten years in the state penitentiary.

The judgment was rendered in October, 1925, and the appeal lodged in this court in March, 1926. No briefs in support of the appeal have been filed, nor was any appearance for oral argument made at the time the case was submitted. We have examined the record, and find that the information properly charges the crime of murder, the evidence supports the verdict and judgment, the issues were fairly submitted, and no jurisdictional or fundamental error is apparent.

The case is affirmed.

DOYLE, P. J., and DAVENPORT, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

EDWARDS, J.

The plaintiff in error was convicted in the district court of Creek county on a charge of manslaughter in the first degree, and was sentenced to serve a term of ten years in the state penitentiary.

The judgment was rendered in October, 1925, and the appeal lodged in this court in March, 1926. No briefs in support of the appeal have been filed, nor was any appearance for oral argument made at the time the case was submitted. We have examined the record, and find that the information properly charges the crime of murder, the evidence supports the verdict and judgment, the issues were fairly submitted, and no jurisdictional or fundamental error is apparent.

The case is affirmed.

DOYLE, P. J., and DAVENPORT, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1928 OK CR 267, 269 P. 508, 40 Okla. Crim. 402, 1928 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oliver-v-state-oklacrimapp-1928.