Oliver v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Oliver v. State

1914 OK CR 93, 140 P. 1197, 10 Okla. Crim. 693, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 212

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedApril 18, 1914

DocketNo. A-2086.

StatusPublished

This text of 1914 OK CR 93 (Oliver v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Oliver v. State, 1914 OK CR 93, 140 P. 1197, 10 Okla. Crim. 693, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 212 (Okla. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

PEE CUEIAM.

The plaintiff in error, Joe Oliver, was convicted at the March, 1913, term of the county court of Eogers county, on a charge of selling 'intoxicating liquor and his punishment fixed at a fine of $100 and imprisonment in the county jail for a term of ninety days. The Attorney General has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the same was not taken in the manner and perfected within the time provided by law. Counsel for plaintiff in error filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the plaintiff in error has become a fugitive from justice and the appeal is therefore abandoned. There is no question but that the appeal should be dismissed and for all practical purposes it is immaterial which motion is sustained. The appeal is dismissed. Mandate ordered forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PEE CUEIAM.

The plaintiff in error, Joe Oliver, was convicted at the March, 1913, term of the county court of Eogers county, on a charge of selling 'intoxicating liquor and his punishment fixed at a fine of $100 and imprisonment in the county jail for a term of ninety days. The Attorney General has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the same was not taken in the manner and perfected within the time provided by law. Counsel for plaintiff in error filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the plaintiff in error has become a fugitive from justice and the appeal is therefore abandoned. There is no question but that the appeal should be dismissed and for all practical purposes it is immaterial which motion is sustained. The appeal is dismissed. Mandate ordered forthwith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1914 OK CR 93, 140 P. 1197, 10 Okla. Crim. 693, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oliver-v-state-oklacrimapp-1914.