Oliver v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Oliver v. State

239 S.W.3d 149, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1612, 2007 WL 4165941

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 27, 2007

DocketED 89129

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 239 S.W.3d 149 (Oliver v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Oliver v. State, 239 S.W.3d 149, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1612, 2007 WL 4165941 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Daryel P. Oliver, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision and affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Daryel P. Oliver, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision and affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

239 S.W.3d 149, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1612, 2007 WL 4165941, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oliver-v-state-moctapp-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack