Oliver v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Oliver v. State

18 S.E.2d 498, 66 Ga. App. 540, 1942 Ga. App. LEXIS 211

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 15, 1942

Docket29299.

StatusPublished

This text of 18 S.E.2d 498 (Oliver v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Oliver v. State, 18 S.E.2d 498, 66 Ga. App. 540, 1942 Ga. App. LEXIS 211 (Ga. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

MacIntyre, J.

The special grounds of the motion for new trial were neither mentioned nor argued in the brief of the defendant, and are treated as abandoned. The evidence for the State, which included an *541 admission by the defendant directly connecting her with the perpetration of the crime charged, was sufficient to authorize the jury to find her guilty of having, possessing, and controlling liquor and whisky, in violation of the Code, § 58-1056.

Decided January 15, 1942. Wyatt & Morgan, for plaintiff in error. L. L. Meadors, solicitor, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Gardner, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MacIntyre, J.

The special grounds of the motion for new trial were neither mentioned nor argued in the brief of the defendant, and are treated as abandoned. The evidence for the State, which included an *541 admission by the defendant directly connecting her with the perpetration of the crime charged, was sufficient to authorize the jury to find her guilty of having, possessing, and controlling liquor and whisky, in violation of the Code, § 58-1056.

Decided January 15, 1942. Wyatt & Morgan, for plaintiff in error. L. L. Meadors, solicitor, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Gardner, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 S.E.2d 498, 66 Ga. App. 540, 1942 Ga. App. LEXIS 211, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oliver-v-state-gactapp-1942.