Oliver v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Oliver v. State

18 S.E.2d 498, 66 Ga. App. 540, 1942 Ga. App. LEXIS 211

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 15, 1942·No. 29299.·Published

Opinion

MacIntyre, J.

The special grounds of the motion for new trial were neither mentioned nor argued in the brief of the defendant, and are treated as abandoned. The evidence for the State, which included an *541 admission by the defendant directly connecting her with the perpetration of the crime charged, was sufficient to authorize the jury to find her guilty of having, possessing, and controlling liquor and whisky, in violation of the Code, § 58-1056.

Decided January 15, 1942. Wyatt & Morgan, for plaintiff in error. L. L. Meadors, solicitor, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Gardner, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MacIntyre, J.

The special grounds of the motion for new trial were neither mentioned nor argued in the brief of the defendant, and are treated as abandoned. The evidence for the State, which included an *541 admission by the defendant directly connecting her with the perpetration of the crime charged, was sufficient to authorize the jury to find her guilty of having, possessing, and controlling liquor and whisky, in violation of the Code, § 58-1056.

Decided January 15, 1942. Wyatt & Morgan, for plaintiff in error. L. L. Meadors, solicitor, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Gardner, J., concur.

Oliver v. State, 18 S.E.2d 498, 66 Ga. App. 540, 1942 Ga. App. LEXIS 211 (Ga. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

18 S.E.2d 498 (Oliver v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.