Oliver v. State

103 S.E. 198, 25 Ga. App. 321, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 774
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 11, 1920
Docket11393
StatusPublished

This text of 103 S.E. 198 (Oliver v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Oliver v. State, 103 S.E. 198, 25 Ga. App. 321, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 774 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. In the light of the particular facts of the case, the charge as a whole, and the notes of the judge qualifying his approval of the amendment to the motion for a new trial, none of the special grounds of the motion shows cause for a reversal of the judgment below.

2. The verdict was amply authorized by the evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 S.E. 198, 25 Ga. App. 321, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 774, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oliver-v-state-gactapp-1920.