Oliver v. State

165 So. 3d 865, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 9446, 2015 WL 3826350
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 22, 2015·No. No. 1D13-4091·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Ricky T. Oliver, appeals his conviction and sentence on two counts of attempted first degree murder. Appellant challenges the trial proceedings on several grounds, and challenges the consecutive mandatory minimum sentences imposed. We affirm the convictions without comment. Regarding the consecutive mandatory sentences, the consecutive provision is mandatory. Walton v. State, 106 So.3d 522, 528 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013), rev. granted, 145 So.3d 830 (Fla.2014). As in Walton, and Jackson v. State, 157 So.3d 539 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015) we certify conflict with Irizarry v. State, 946 So.2d 555 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006).

WOLF and BILBREY, JJ., and HULSLANDER, VICTOR L., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oliver v. State, 165 So. 3d 865, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 9446, 2015 WL 3826350 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

165 So. 3d 865 (Oliver v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ricky T. Oliver v. State of Florida
220 So. 3d 1289 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)