Oliver v. State
This text of 779 So. 2d 560 (Oliver v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Willie Ann Oliver appeals the summary denial of her motion to correct an illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm the trial court’s order. We note, however, that we cannot discern from Oliver’s motion or the trial court’s order whether Oliver’s sentence was the result of a negotiated plea. If it was, Oliver might be entitled to relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. This affirmance is without prejudice for Oliver to seek such relief. See Gibson v. State, 775 So.2d 353 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000); Murphy v. State, 773 So.2d 1174 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (en banc).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
779 So. 2d 560, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 539, 2001 WL 62718, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oliver-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.