Oliver v. State

779 So. 2d 560, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 539, 2001 WL 62718
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Oliver v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 819 So. 2d 816
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 26, 2001·No. No. 2D00-3763·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Willie Ann Oliver appeals the summary denial of her motion to correct an illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm the trial court’s order. We note, however, that we cannot discern from Oliver’s motion or the trial court’s order whether Oliver’s sentence was the result of a negotiated plea. If it was, Oliver might be entitled to relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. This affirmance is without prejudice for Oliver to seek such relief. See Gibson v. State, 775 So.2d 353 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000); Murphy v. State, 773 So.2d 1174 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (en banc).

Affirmed.

BLUE, A.C.J., and FULMER and GREEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oliver v. State, 779 So. 2d 560, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 539, 2001 WL 62718 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

779 So. 2d 560 (Oliver v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gibson v. State
775 So. 2d 353 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Murphy v. State
773 So. 2d 1174 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)