Oliver v. State

779 So. 2d 560, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 539, 2001 WL 62718
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 26, 2001
DocketNo. 2D00-3763
StatusPublished

This text of 779 So. 2d 560 (Oliver v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Oliver v. State, 779 So. 2d 560, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 539, 2001 WL 62718 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Willie Ann Oliver appeals the summary denial of her motion to correct an illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm the trial court’s order. We note, however, that we cannot discern from Oliver’s motion or the trial court’s order whether Oliver’s sentence was the result of a negotiated plea. If it was, Oliver might be entitled to relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. This affirmance is without prejudice for Oliver to seek such relief. See Gibson v. State, 775 So.2d 353 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000); Murphy v. State, 773 So.2d 1174 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (en banc).

Affirmed.

BLUE, A.C.J., and FULMER and GREEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gibson v. State
775 So. 2d 353 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Murphy v. State
773 So. 2d 1174 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
779 So. 2d 560, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 539, 2001 WL 62718, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oliver-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.