Oliver v. State
627 So. 2d 56, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11661, 1993 WL 477680
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 17, 1993·No. No. 92-02409·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We affirm the appellant’s judgments and sentences in all respects except we remand the judgment as to count I for correction of a clerical error. The judgment reflects a conviction for burglary while armed; however, the jury found the appellant guilty of trespass in a structure while armed. The judg[57]*57ment should be corrected to reflect the jury’s verdict. The appellant need not be present.
Affirmed; remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Oliver v. State, 627 So. 2d 56, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11661, 1993 WL 477680 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).
627 So. 2d 56 (Oliver v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Baque v. State
653 So. 2d 1105 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)