Oliver v. State
This text of 414 So. 2d 1087 (Oliver v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm appellant’s conviction and his maximum sentence for attempted first degree murder. However, the sentencing order and transcript of the sentencing hearing are silent on the court’s particular justification for retention over the first third of the sentence.
Accordingly, we REMAND to the court with instructions to either relinquish jurisdiction over the first third of the sentence or state with individual particularity the justification for retaining jurisdiction. See Sanders v. State, 400 So.2d 1015, 1016 (Fla.2d DCA 1981); § 947.16(3), Fla.Stat. (1981).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
414 So. 2d 1087, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19955, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oliver-v-state-fladistctapp-1982.