Oliver v. Sale
This text of 1 Super. Ct. Jud. 29 (Oliver v. Sale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Evidence being clear that Sale had said he would not sell them as Slaves, and told Plaintiff to when they were fold, the Court directed the Jury to find Defendant Costs.
N. B. In Aggravation of Damages, had they found for the Plaintiff, Mr. Thacker said: “Oliver by selling these Boys for Slaves exposed himself to a Writ of Replevin,
Homine replegiando. Vid. F. N. B. 66. New Nat. B. 151, 152.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Super. Ct. Jud. 29, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oliver-v-sale-mass-1762.