Oliver v. Montgomery

42 Iowa 36
Supreme Court of Iowa·Decided December 13, 1875·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Day, J".

The court erred in refusing to make the judgment for the amount of taxes paid a lien upon the lots on which the taxes were assessed.

The payment of the defendants relieved the land from the lien then existing, and enured to plaintiff’s benefit. It is right and equitable that defendants should be subrogated to the lien before existing. The fact that the former opinion of this court was silent respecting a lien cannot be fairly construed., [38]*38into a denial of the existence of the right. If final decree had been entered in this court the lien would have been preserved. See Sears v. Sellew, 28 Iowa, 501; Orr v. Travacier, 21 Iowa, 68.

The judgment of the court below is

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oliver v. Montgomery, 42 Iowa 36 (iowa 1875).

42 Iowa 36 (Oliver v. Montgomery) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Clark Bros. v. Watson
180 Iowa 721 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1916)
Victoria Copper Mining Co. v. Rich
193 F. 314 (Sixth Circuit, 1911)
Ringen Stove Co. v. Bowers
80 N.W. 318 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1899)
Carson v. Broady
77 N.W. 80 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1898)
Newbold v. Smart
67 Ala. 326 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1880)
Besore v. Dosh
43 Iowa 211 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1876)