Oliver v. Magnolia Clinic

57 So. 3d 307, 2011 La. LEXIS 694, 2011 WL 1111737
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided March 25, 2011·No. No. 2010-C-2766·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

ORDER

Vacated and remanded. La. Const. Art. V, § 8(B) provides that a “majority of the judges sitting in a case must concur to render judgment.” The court of appeal’s decree does not reflect a majority judgment on the principal issues considered in the instant case.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, the ruling of the court of appeal is vacated. It is further ordered that this matter be considered en bane so that a decree can be rendered reflecting a majority vote on each of the issues presented.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oliver v. Magnolia Clinic, 57 So. 3d 307, 2011 La. LEXIS 694, 2011 WL 1111737 (La. 2011).

57 So. 3d 307 (Oliver v. Magnolia Clinic) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Oliver v. MAGNOLIA CLINIC
85 So. 3d 39 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2012)
Oliver v. MAGNOLIA CLINIC
71 So. 3d 1170 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2011)