Oliver v. Howell
This text of 5 N.J.L. 581 (Oliver v. Howell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Oliver was taken upon a warrant issued by justice Vanhorn, and with Tillman, entered into a recognizance for his appearance at a future day, according to the directions of the statute. Oliver did not appear at the day, and the plaintiff, Howell, refused to proceed to try his cause, but suffered a nonsuit, and commenced this action against Oliver and Tillman on the recognizance. The summons was returned, served “ by leaving a copy with the wife of John Tillman, one of the defendants.” The judgment is against both, for 35 dollars, debt, and 5 dollars, 19 cents, costs.
Two errors appear in this record. 1. The summons was served on one only of the defendants; the judgment is against both,
2. Howell ought to have tried his action against Oliver, and obtained judgment against him before ho brought suit on the recognizance.
Judgment reversed.
Ford vs. Munson, 1 South. 93.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 N.J.L. 581, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oliver-v-howell-nj-1819.