Oliver v. Farmer's State Bank
This text of 159 S.E.2d 405 (Oliver v. Farmer's State Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The only question for decision is whether or not a conveyance to the wife, who is the applicant here for summary judgment, was made by her husband to hinder or delay his creditors. Such transactions between husband and wife must be closely scrutinized. Code Ch. 37-7; Booher v. Worrill, 57 Ga. 235; Kennedy v. Lee, 72 Ga. 39. The facts disclose that the husband was in possession, represented to his creditor that he owned the property and the insurance thereon was in his name when credit was extended. His affidavit also stated that he had had a heart attack and wanted to place title in his wife because it was hers. All of these facts created a jury question. Accordingly, it was not error to deny the motion for summary judgment.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
159 S.E.2d 405, 224 Ga. 56, 1968 Ga. LEXIS 668, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oliver-v-farmers-state-bank-ga-1968.