Oliver v. Davis, Agent

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Oliver v. Davis, Agent

111 S.E. 791, 118 S.C. 437, 1922 S.C. LEXIS 38

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedApril 11, 1922

Docket10865

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 111 S.E. 791 (Oliver v. Davis, Agent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Oliver v. Davis, Agent, 111 S.E. 791, 118 S.C. 437, 1922 S.C. LEXIS 38 (S.C. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Fraser.

This is an action for damages for personal injuries to a passenger. There are only two questions in the case, and the consideration of them does not require a statement of the facts.

I. When there in a conflict between the Circuit Judge and the stenographer as to the exact language of the charge, must this Court accept the statement of the trial Judge or the stenographer ? The answer is that the statement of the trial Judge shall prevail. It is not clear that there is a conflict in this case. ’The question is decided against the appellant.

II. Was the verdict excessive? This Court cannot say it was so excessive as to warrant setting aside a judgment based upon it. This question is decided against the appellant.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI