Oliver v. Corizon Healthcare Inc
This text of Oliver v. Corizon Healthcare Inc (Oliver v. Corizon Healthcare Inc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Michigan primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
JEFFREY CORTEZ OLIVER, Case No. 22-12104 Plaintiff, F. Kay Behm Vv. United States District Judge CORIZON HEALTHCARE INC., et al., Elizabeth A. Stafford United States Magistrate Judge Defendants. a ORDER ADOPTING AND ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF No. 28) AND TERMINATING MOTION TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE (ECF No. 21) Currently before the court is Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Stafford’s March
30, 2023 Report and Recommendation. (ECF No. 28). Magistrate Judge Stafford recommends granting the motions to dismiss filed by Defendants Ames and
Wellpath. fd. The court is fully advised in the premises and has reviewed the record and the pleadings. Neither party has filed objections. “[T]he failure to
object to the magistrate judge’s report[] releases the Court from its duty to
independently review the matter.” Hall v. Rawal, 2012 WL 3639070 (E.D. Mich.
Aug. 24, 2012) (citing Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985)). The court
nevertheless agrees with the Magistrate Judge’s recommended disposition. Therefore, the Court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s Report and
Recommendation (ECF No. 28), GRANTS the motions to dismiss (ECF Nos. 10, 15), and DISMISSES the complaint as to these Defendants. Also pending in this matter is Corizon’s motion to dismiss the complaint. (ECF No. 21). The court notes that this matter is automatically stayed as to Defendant Corizon, who has filed for bankruptcy. (ECF No. 26). Thus, the court
takes no action on Corizon’s motion. McBride v. Canlas, 2023 WL 2569119, at *1 (W.D. Mich. Mar. 20, 2023) (Because of the automatic stay in Corizon’s
bankruptcy proceeding, the court declined to address the report and
recommendation as to any claims against Corizon); Dean v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., 72 F.3d 754, 756 (9th Cir. 1995) (Post-petition dismissal in favor of debtor
violated automatic stay); Pope v. Manville Forest Prod. Corp., 778 F.2d 238, 239 (5th Cir. 1985) (Entry of an order of dismissal violated automatic stay). Accordingly, based on the automatic stay and for purposes of docket efficiency, the court will TERMINATE Corizon’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 21) without
prejudice. SO ORDERED.
Date: September 20, 2023 s/F. Kay Behm F. Kay Behm United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Oliver v. Corizon Healthcare Inc, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oliver-v-corizon-healthcare-inc-mied-2023.