Oliver v. Chance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Oliver v. Chance

191 S.E. 871, 56 Ga. App. 40, 1937 Ga. App. LEXIS 274

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided May 26, 1937·No. 26168·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Felton, J.

This case arose on a caveat to tbe appointment of an administrator. Tbe question to be decided is as to tbe validity of a common-law marriage. The evidence, though conflicting, authorized the jury to And that the parties agreed to live together as husband and wife, and that they held themselves out as such after the said agreement. There is no merit in any of the grounds for new trial; and the verdict, having the approval of the trial judge, will not be disturbed..

Judgment affirmed.

Stephens, P. J., and Sutton, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Felton, J.

This case arose on a caveat to tbe appointment of an administrator. Tbe question to be decided is as to tbe validity of a common-law marriage. The evidence, though conflicting, authorized the jury to And that the parties agreed to live together as husband and wife, and that they held themselves out as such after the said agreement. There is no merit in any of the grounds for new trial; and the verdict, having the approval of the trial judge, will not be disturbed..

Judgment affirmed.

Stephens, P. J., and Sutton, J., concur.

Oliver v. Chance, 191 S.E. 871, 56 Ga. App. 40, 1937 Ga. App. LEXIS 274 (Ga. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

191 S.E. 871 (Oliver v. Chance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related