Oliver v. Chamberlin

Supreme Court of Vermont

Oliver v. Chamberlin

1 D. Chip. 41, 1 N. Chip. 16

CourtSupreme Court of Vermont

DecidedDecember 15, 1789

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 D. Chip. 41 (Oliver v. Chamberlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Oliver v. Chamberlin, 1 D. Chip. 41, 1 N. Chip. 16 (Vt. 1789).

Pincite

Opinion

But before the Court rendered judgment on the verdict, they directed the plaintiff to enter into a rule, that the defendant should have the benefit of the judgment, which had been obtained against Gile, the defendant indemnifying the plaintiff from cost, which was done accordingly, and judgment was rendered for the plaintiff for the whole of his debt. 2 Ld. Ray. 1411. Powell vs. Hord. 1 Stra. 650.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

But before the Court rendered judgment on the verdict, they directed the plaintiff to enter into a rule, that the defendant should have the benefit of the judgment, which had been obtained against Gile, the defendant indemnifying the plaintiff from cost, which was done accordingly, and judgment was rendered for the plaintiff for the whole of his debt. 2 Ld. Ray. 1411. Powell vs. Hord. 1 Stra. 650.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 D. Chip. 41, 1 N. Chip. 16, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oliver-v-chamberlin-vt-1789.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack