Oliver v. Braxton

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: August 30, 2001
• Docket: 01-6741
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6741

DAN OLIVER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

D. BRAXTON, Warden; T. FOWLKES, Ombudsman; H. CLARK, Operational Officer; RN TWEATY; RN RAY; DOCTOR WARREN; RN CASPER; KEELING, Assistant Warden; R. FLEMING, Regional Director; WRIGHT, of Records,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

LIEUTENANT FALZT; OFFICER WILLIAMS; OFFICER DAVIDSON; SERGEANT MOSLEY; OFFICER PURDY; LIEUTENANT BARBOUR; LIEUTENANT ROSS; OFFICER WILSON; SERGEANT BERNARD; SERGEANT WHITE; OFFICER SUTTON; S. HARRISON, Director, Depart- ment of Corrections,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CA-01-121-AM)

Submitted: August 23, 2001 Decided: August 30, 2001 Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dan Oliver, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Dan Oliver appeals the district court’s order denying relief

on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint under 28

U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record

and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

Oliver v. Braxton, No. CA-01-121-AM (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 30, 2001;

entered Apr. 2, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED