Oliver v. Ameris Bank

District Court, S.D. Georgia·Decided January 25, 2021·No. 4:20-cv-00273·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA SAVANNAH DIVISION

ANTHONY OLIVER,

Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO.: 4:20-cv-273

v.

AMERIS BANK; CHEX SYSTEMS, INC.; TRANS UNION, LLC; EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.; and EQUIFAX INFORMATION SOLUTIONS,

Defendants.

O RDE R Before the Court is the Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice of Trans Union LLC, which was filed on January 12, 2021, and is signed by counsel for all parties to the case. (Doc. 46.) In that filing, the parties stipulate to the dismissal, with prejudice, of all claims asserted by Plaintiff against Defendant Trans Union, with each party to pay its own attorney’s fees and costs. (Id.) Accordingly, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the Court DISMISSES Defendant Trans Union WITH PREJUDICE, with each party to bear its fees and costs. See Plains Growers, Inc. v. Ickes-Braun Glasshouses, Inc., 474 F.2d 250, 255 (5th Cir. 1973) (“[R]eading the rules governing dismissal by notice and dismissal by motion together, we conclude that it was intended by the rule-makers to permit dismissal against such of the defendants as have not served an answer or motion for summary judgment... .”).! The Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to update the docket accordingly SO ORDERED, this 25th day of January, 2021.

R. STAN BAKER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

' Tn Bonner v. City of Prichard, 661 F.2d 1206, 1209 (11th Cir. 1981) (en banc), the Eleventh Circuit adopted as binding precedent all decisions of the former Fifth Circuit handed down prior to October 1, 1981.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oliver v. Ameris Bank, (S.D. Ga. 2021).

Oliver v. Ameris Bank (Oliver v. Ameris Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, Alabama
661 F.2d 1206 (Eleventh Circuit, 1981)