Oliver Smith v. United States

416 F.2d 1255, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 10392
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedOctober 16, 1969
Docket33658_1
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 416 F.2d 1255 (Oliver Smith v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Oliver Smith v. United States, 416 F.2d 1255, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 10392 (2d Cir. 1969).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Oliver Smith appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York denying without a hearing a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1964) to vacate his conviction.

Appellant was convicted of violating 21 U.S.C. §§ 173, 174 (1964). The conviction and orders denying two motions for a new trial were affirmed from the bench by this court.

On this appeal appellant contends that the Government failed to comply with 18 U.S.C. § 3500 (1964) by not turning over the “Daily Attendance and Expense Sheet” of the Government’s witness, Agent Frank Selvaggi.

The “Daily Attendance and Expense Sheet” is used solely for office administration. It is not the type of material contemplated by Section 3500.

Moreover the judge who originally convicted Smith, after a trial without a jury, denied Smith’s § 2255 application, thus holding, in effect, that the document in question would not have influenced his initial determination of guilt.

Even if refusal to require production of the disputed document were in error it would be merely a defect in the trial correctable on appeal.

“Only when there has been a deprivation of rights so fundamental as to amount to a denial of a fair trial can the conviction and sentence be set aside under § 2255.” United States v. Angelet, 255 F.2d 383, 384 (2d Cir. 1958).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Ortiz
367 F. Supp. 2d 536 (S.D. New York, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
416 F.2d 1255, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 10392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oliver-smith-v-united-states-ca2-1969.