Oliver J. Middleton v. United States
269 F.2d 241, 106 U.S. App. D.C. 50, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 3585
Opinion
In our opinion the circumstantial evidence on which appellant was convicted of housebreaking could not fairly be thought to prove him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Accordingly his motion for acquittal should have been granted, and a judgment of acquittal should now be entered.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Oliver J. Middleton v. United States, 269 F.2d 241, 106 U.S. App. D.C. 50, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 3585 (D.C. Cir. 1959).
269 F.2d 241 (Oliver J. Middleton v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Earl R. Cephus v. United States
324 F.2d 893 (D.C. Circuit, 1963)