Oliver H. Daniel v. The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company
This text of 878 F.2d 381 (Oliver H. Daniel v. The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
878 F.2d 381
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Oliver H. DANIEL, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
The OHIO CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 88-5797.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
July 5, 1989.
Before MERRITT and KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judges, DOUGLAS W. HILLMAN, District Judge.*
ORDER
Because the district court's purported certification for this appeal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b) does not comply with Solomon v. Aetna Life Ins. Co., 782 F.2d 58 (6th Cir.1986), and Knafel v. Pepsi Cola Bottlers, 850 F.2d 1155 (6th Cir.1988), IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is dismissed and the case is REMANDED to the trial court.
The Honorable Douglas W. Hillman, Chief District Court Judge for the Western District of Michigan, sitting by designation
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
878 F.2d 381, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 9645, 1989 WL 72928, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oliver-h-daniel-v-the-ohio-casualty-insurance-company-ca6-1989.