Oliver Ditson Co. v. Testa

99 N.E. 949, 213 Mass. 109, 1912 Mass. LEXIS 676
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedNovember 25, 1912
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 99 N.E. 949 (Oliver Ditson Co. v. Testa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Oliver Ditson Co. v. Testa, 99 N.E. 949, 213 Mass. 109, 1912 Mass. LEXIS 676 (Mass. 1912).

Opinion

Rugg, C. J.

This is an appeal from an order of the Superior Court overruling a plea in abatement. There has been no trial on the merits and no judgment. Hence the case is not properly [110]*110here. It has been decided many times that this court has no jurisdiction to consider an appeal from any interlocutory decision until after judgment unless the judge reports the question. Cotter v. Nathan & Hurst Co. 211 Mass. 31, and cases cited. Cummings v. Ayer, 188 Mass. 292. Fay v. Upton, 153 Mass. 6. Shawmut Commercial Paper Co. v. Cram, 212 Mass. 108.

C. Toye, for the defendant. A. M. Schwarz & S. A. Dearborn, for the plaintiff.

Appeal dismissed.

The case was submitted on briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Weil v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.
104 N.E. 343 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1914)
Farris v. St. Paul's Baptist Church
104 N.E. 639 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1914)
Zuccaro v. Nazzaro
103 N.E. 907 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
99 N.E. 949, 213 Mass. 109, 1912 Mass. LEXIS 676, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oliver-ditson-co-v-testa-mass-1912.