Oliver Croomes v. Utonda Croomes
Opinion
Opinion issued January 23, 2014
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-13-00924-CV ——————————— OLIVER CROOMES, Appellant V. UTONDA CROOMES, Appellee
On Appeal from the 280th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2013-43792
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Oliver Croomes, has neither paid the required fees nor
established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1;
see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.941(a), 101.041 (West 2013);
Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket
No. 07-9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in TEX. R. APP. P. app. A § B(1).
After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not
adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 42.3(c).
We dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees. We dismiss any
pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Massengale and Huddle.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Oliver Croomes v. Utonda Croomes (Oliver Croomes v. Utonda Croomes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.