Oliver Co. v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Oliver Co. v. Smith

64 S.E. 1007, 6 Ga. App. 285, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 263

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJune 15, 1909

Docket1556

StatusPublished

This text of 64 S.E. 1007 (Oliver Co. v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Oliver Co. v. Smith, 64 S.E. 1007, 6 Ga. App. 285, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 263 (Ga. Ct. App. 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

Powell, J.

1. 'Rulings occurring upon a trial can not be complained of in a bill of eiceptions filed more than thirty days after the expiration of the term at which the trial was had, unless exceptions pendente lite have been duly preserved.

2. There was no error in overruling’the motion for a new trial based on the general grounds alone, since the evidence, though conflicting, was sufficient to authorize the verdict. ■ Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Powell, J.

1. 'Rulings occurring upon a trial can not be complained of in a bill of eiceptions filed more than thirty days after the expiration of the term at which the trial was had, unless exceptions pendente lite have been duly preserved.

2. There was no error in overruling’the motion for a new trial based on the general grounds alone, since the evidence, though conflicting, was sufficient to authorize the verdict. ■ Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

64 S.E. 1007, 6 Ga. App. 285, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 263, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oliver-co-v-smith-gactapp-1909.