Oliver Co. v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Oliver Co. v. Smith

64 S.E. 1007, 6 Ga. App. 285, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 263

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided June 15, 1909·No. 1556·Published

Opinion

Powell, J.

1. 'Rulings occurring upon a trial can not be complained of in a bill of eiceptions filed more than thirty days after the expiration of the term at which the trial was had, unless exceptions pendente lite have been duly preserved.

2. There was no error in overruling’the motion for a new trial based on the general grounds alone, since the evidence, though conflicting, was sufficient to authorize the verdict. ■ Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Powell, J.

1. 'Rulings occurring upon a trial can not be complained of in a bill of eiceptions filed more than thirty days after the expiration of the term at which the trial was had, unless exceptions pendente lite have been duly preserved.

2. There was no error in overruling’the motion for a new trial based on the general grounds alone, since the evidence, though conflicting, was sufficient to authorize the verdict. ■ Judgment affirmed.

Oliver Co. v. Smith, 64 S.E. 1007, 6 Ga. App. 285, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 263 (Ga. Ct. App. 1909).

Pincite

64 S.E. 1007 (Oliver Co. v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.