Olive v. Olive

127 So. 915, 221 Ala. 697
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided March 20, 1930·No. 8 Div. 92.·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

ANDERSON, C. J.

The appellants filed the bill in this case to establish the right to inherit the estate of J. Y. Olive, deceased, by seeking a specific performance of an agreement to adopt «them and to make them his heirs at law. The pleading and proof does not bring this case within the influence of Prince v. Prince, 194 Ala. 455, 69 So. 906, and it is more properly governed by the recent case of Marietta v. Faulkner, 126 So. 635, 1 wherein said Prince Case was discussed and differentiated, and which said last case fully justified the trial court in denying the complainants relief - and in dismissing the bill of complaint.

The decree of the circuit court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

SAYRE, THOMAS, and BROWN, JJ., cóncur.
1

220 Ala. 561.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Olive v. Olive, 127 So. 915, 221 Ala. 697 (Ala. 1930).

127 So. 915 (Olive v. Olive) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nance v. Person
567 So. 2d 265 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1990)
Aniton v. Robinson
134 So. 2d 764 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1961)
Wiginton v. Milford
122 So. 2d 769 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1960)
Luker v. Hyde
69 So. 2d 421 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1953)
Benefield v. Faulkner
29 So. 2d 1 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1947)