Olive v. Kao

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Olive v. Kao

97 A.D.2d 460, 468 N.Y.S.2d 574, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20053

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 17, 1983

StatusPublished

This text of 97 A.D.2d 460 (Olive v. Kao) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Olive v. Kao, 97 A.D.2d 460, 468 N.Y.S.2d 574, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20053 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by defendant John Kao, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Monteleone, J.), dated September 14, 1982, as granted the motion of the plaintiff to vacate her default in appearing in opposition to a motion to dismiss her complaint and thereupon opened her default in resuming prosecution of the action against defendant Kao, upon certain conditions. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. In light of the facts herein, there has been no abuse of discretion on the part of Special Term. Mollen, P. J., Thompson, Rubin and Boyers, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by defendant John Kao, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Monteleone, J.), dated September 14, 1982, as granted the motion of the plaintiff to vacate her default in appearing in opposition to a motion to dismiss her complaint and thereupon opened her default in resuming prosecution of the action against defendant Kao, upon certain conditions. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. In light of the facts herein, there has been no abuse of discretion on the part of Special Term. Mollen, P. J., Thompson, Rubin and Boyers, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

97 A.D.2d 460, 468 N.Y.S.2d 574, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20053, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/olive-v-kao-nyappdiv-1983.