Olivav. Dover Drag Strip Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Olivav. Dover Drag Strip Realty Corp.

38 A.D.2d 975, 331 N.Y.S.2d 893, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5082

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 27, 1972

StatusPublished

This text of 38 A.D.2d 975 (Olivav. Dover Drag Strip Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Olivav. Dover Drag Strip Realty Corp., 38 A.D.2d 975, 331 N.Y.S.2d 893, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5082 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

In consolidated negligence actions to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., defendant Dover Drag Strip, Inc. appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered June 16, 1971, against it and in favor of plaintiff Dennis R. Oliva, upon a jury verdict of $40,000. Judgment reversed, on the law and the facts, and new trial granted as between said plaintiff and said defendant, with costs to abide the event. The alleged negligence of appellant, in the operation of an automobile race track, consisted of failure to provide adequate barriers between the track and the spectators and failure to discover, through reasonable inspection, a substandard bellhousing on one of the racing cars. In our opinion, neither of these theories of liability was [976]*976proven by a preponderance of the evidence. We might add that, if both theories are submitted to the jury at the new trial, it would be appropriate to instruct the jury to render a special verdict, because if a general verdict is returned, and in respondent’s favor, but the evidence, upon review, is deemed to support only one of the grounds submitted to the jury, the judgment could not stand (Hamilton v. Presbyterian Hosp. of City of N. Y., 25 A D 2d 431). Rabin, P. J., Hopkins, Latham, Gulotta and Christ, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In consolidated negligence actions to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., defendant Dover Drag Strip, Inc. appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered June 16, 1971, against it and in favor of plaintiff Dennis R. Oliva, upon a jury verdict of $40,000. Judgment reversed, on the law and the facts, and new trial granted as between said plaintiff and said defendant, with costs to abide the event. The alleged negligence of appellant, in the operation of an automobile race track, consisted of failure to provide adequate barriers between the track and the spectators and failure to discover, through reasonable inspection, a substandard bellhousing on one of the racing cars. In our opinion, neither of these theories of liability was [976]*976proven by a preponderance of the evidence. We might add that, if both theories are submitted to the jury at the new trial, it would be appropriate to instruct the jury to render a special verdict, because if a general verdict is returned, and in respondent’s favor, but the evidence, upon review, is deemed to support only one of the grounds submitted to the jury, the judgment could not stand (Hamilton v. Presbyterian Hosp. of City of N. Y., 25 A D 2d 431). Rabin, P. J., Hopkins, Latham, Gulotta and Christ, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

38 A.D.2d 975, 331 N.Y.S.2d 893, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5082, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/olivav-dover-drag-strip-realty-corp-nyappdiv-1972.