Olivaria v. Lin & Son Realty Corp.

84 A.D.3d 423, 922 N.Y.S.2d 337
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 3, 2011
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 84 A.D.3d 423 (Olivaria v. Lin & Son Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Olivaria v. Lin & Son Realty Corp., 84 A.D.3d 423, 922 N.Y.S.2d 337 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

[424]*424Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lucindo Suarez, J.), entered February 8, 2010, which denied defendant Lin & Son Realty Corp.’s motion to vacate the default judgment entered against it, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs, and the motion granted.

Plaintiff Cynthia Olivaría was allegedly injured by carbon monoxide fumes that emanated from a portable heater at her workplace. The premises, consisting of two floors of office space, had been leased by Lin to the injured plaintiffs employer under a written instrument.

Upon bringing this negligence action, plaintiffs served Lin by delivery of copies of the summons and complaint to the Secretary of State pursuant to Business Corporation Law § 306. By order entered on February 4, 2003, Supreme Court (Janice L. Bowman, J.) granted plaintiffs’ motion for a default judgment against Lin. Following an inquest, the court (Lucindo Suarez, J.) directed the Clerk to enter judgment by order dated August 11, 2009. Thereupon, the Clerk entered a money judgment in favor of plaintiffs against Lin on August 20, 2009. In November 2009, Lin moved for an order vacating the default judgment and permitting it to interpose an answer. The Supreme Court denied the motion, finding that Lin was not entitled to relief under CPLR 5015 (a) (1) because it had not made the requisite showing of a reasonable excuse for its default. The court also found that relief under CPLR 317 was unavailable because Lin’s motion was untimely.

Relief under CPLR 5015 (a) (1) was properly denied. The record shows that Lin did not receive process because it failed to maintain a current address on file with the Secretary of State for 18 years (see On Assignment v Medasorb Tech., LLC, 50 AD3d 342 [2008]; Business Corporation Law § 408).

The Supreme Court should not have concluded, however, that Lin’s request for relief under CPLR 317 was untimely. The statute permits a defendant who has been “served with a summons other than by personal delivery” and has not appeared to defend the action upon a finding of the court that the defendant “did not personally receive notice of the summons in time to defend and has a meritorious defense” (CPLR 317). A defendant so served may be allowed to defend the action “within one year after [such defendant] obtains knowledge of entry of the judgment, but in no event more than five years after such entry” [425]*425(id.).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Arias v. City of New York
2025 NY Slip Op 06891 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v. Sanderson
2024 NY Slip Op 05331 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
Wolman v. Now Solutions, Inc.
2024 NY Slip Op 30375(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2024)
Gomez v. Karyes Realty Corp.
2022 NY Slip Op 07187 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
People v. Lane
2021 NY Slip Op 07324 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
Home Care Assoc., Inc. v. Smith
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017
Booso v. Tausik Brothers, LLC
2017 NY Slip Op 2400 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Marte v. 102-06 43 Avenue, LLC
135 A.D.3d 457 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Li Xian v. Tat Lee Supplies Co., Inc.
126 A.D.3d 424 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Diggs v. Karen Manor Associates, LLC
117 A.D.3d 401 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
84 A.D.3d 423, 922 N.Y.S.2d 337, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/olivaria-v-lin-son-realty-corp-nyappdiv-2011.