Olivarez, Ex Parte Richard James

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 21, 2007
DocketAP-75,641
StatusPublished

This text of Olivarez, Ex Parte Richard James (Olivarez, Ex Parte Richard James) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Olivarez, Ex Parte Richard James, (Tex. 2007).

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS




NOS. AP-75,640 & AP-75,641



EX PARTE RICHARD JAMES OLIVAREZ, Applicant



ON APPLICATIONS FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NOS. F04-00148-JU & F03-50458-WU IN THE 291
ST DISTRICT COURT

FROM DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N



Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of intoxication manslaughter and intoxication assault. He was sentenced to imprisonment for forty-five and twenty-five years, respectively. The Fifth Court of Appeals affirmed his convictions. Olivarez v. State, Nos. 05-04-00862-CR & 05-04-00863-CR (Tex. App.-Dallas, delivered May 18, 2005, no pet.).

Applicant contends, among other things, that his appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance because he failed to timely notify Applicant that his convictions had been affirmed and failed to advise him of his right to petition for discretionary review pro se.

Appellate counsel filed an affidavit with the trial court. Based on that affidavit, the trial court has entered findings of fact and conclusions of law that appellate counsel failed to timely notify Applicant that his convictions had been affirmed and failed to advise him of his right to petition for discretionary appeal pro se. The trial court recommends that relief be granted. Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997). We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file out-of-time petitions for discretionary review of the judgments of the Fifth Court of Appeals in Cause Nos. 05-04-00862-CR and 05-04-00863-CR that affirmed his convictions in Case Nos. F04-00148-JU and F03-50458-WU from the 291st Judicial District Court of Dallas County. Applicant shall file his petitions for discretionary review with the Fifth Court of Appeals within 30 days of the date on which this Court's mandate issues. Applicant's other claims are dismissed. Ex parte Torres, 943 S.W.2d 469 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997).



Delivered: March 21, 2007

Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Wilson
956 S.W.2d 25 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1997)
Ex Parte Torres
943 S.W.2d 469 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1997)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Olivarez, Ex Parte Richard James, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/olivarez-ex-parte-richard-james-texcrimapp-2007.