Olivares v. Cam Electronics Distributing Corp.

264 A.D.2d 440, 693 N.Y.S.2d 452, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8693

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County [441] (Spires, J.), entered May 29, 1998, which, upon the granting of the defendants’ motions to dismiss the complaint at the close of the evidence, is in favor of the defendants and against him, dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss, as the plaintiff failed to prove that he suffered a serious injury as a matter of law (see, Licari v Elliott, 57 NY2d 230; Grotzer v Levy, 133 AD2d 67; Insurance Law § 5102 [d]). Santucci, J. P., Krausman, Florio and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Olivares v. Cam Electronics Distributing Corp., 264 A.D.2d 440, 693 N.Y.S.2d 452, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8693 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

264 A.D.2d 440 (Olivares v. Cam Electronics Distributing Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Licari v. Elliott
441 N.E.2d 1088 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)
Grotzer v. Levy
133 A.D.2d 67 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)