Oliva v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Oliva v. State

739 So. 2d 682, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 11695, 1999 WL 674533

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 1, 1999

DocketNo. 99-1101

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 739 So. 2d 682 (Oliva v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Oliva v. State, 739 So. 2d 682, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 11695, 1999 WL 674533 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon the State’s proper confession of error, we reverse the trial court’s order revoking defendant’s probation, and remand with directions to enter a written order that conforms to the trial court’s oral pronouncement. See Salvatierra v. State, 691 So.2d 32, 32 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) (“A written order of probation must conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncement at a defendant’s probation revocation hearing.”).

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon the State’s proper confession of error, we reverse the trial court’s order revoking defendant’s probation, and remand with directions to enter a written order that conforms to the trial court’s oral pronouncement. See Salvatierra v. State, 691 So.2d 32, 32 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) (“A written order of probation must conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncement at a defendant’s probation revocation hearing.”).

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

739 So. 2d 682, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 11695, 1999 WL 674533, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oliva-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack