Oliva v. Maryland
This text of 81 F. App'x 762 (Oliva v. Maryland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Thomas Oliva and Louis J. De Maio appeal the district court’s order dismissing their complaint alleging civil violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act under 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (2000), et seq. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Oliva v. Maryland, No. CA-03-1936-JFM (D.Md. July 10, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
81 F. App'x 762, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oliva-v-maryland-ca4-2003.