Oliva v. Maryland

Fourth Circuit

Oliva v. Maryland

81 F. App'x 762

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 20, 2003·No. No. 03-1976·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Thomas Oliva and Louis J. De Maio appeal the district court’s order dismissing their complaint alleging civil violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act under 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (2000), et seq. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Oliva v. Maryland, No. CA-03-1936-JFM (D.Md. July 10, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Thomas Oliva and Louis J. De Maio appeal the district court’s order dismissing their complaint alleging civil violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act under 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (2000), et seq. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Oliva v. Maryland, No. CA-03-1936-JFM (D.Md. July 10, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Oliva v. Maryland, 81 F. App'x 762 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

81 F. App'x 762 (Oliva v. Maryland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related