Oliva v. Christiana Trust

275 So. 3d 774
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 26, 2019·No. No. 3D18-2301·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See § 45.031, Fla. Stat. (2018) ; IndyMac Fed. Bank FSB v. Hagan, 104 So. 3d 1232, 1236 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) (holding: "Florida case law is clear that the substance of an objection to a foreclosure sale under section 45.031(5) must be directed toward conduct that occurred at, or which related to, the foreclosure sale itself"); Mody v. Cal. Fed. Bank, 747 So. 2d 1016, 1017-18 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) (holding: "In order to vacate a foreclosure sale, the trial court must find: (1) that the foreclosure sale bid was grossly or startlingly inadequate; and (2) that the inadequacy of the bid resulted from some mistake, fraud or other irregularity in the sale.")

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oliva v. Christiana Trust, 275 So. 3d 774 (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

275 So. 3d 774 (Oliva v. Christiana Trust) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mody v. California Federal Bank
747 So. 2d 1016 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Indymac Federal Bank FSB v. Hagan
104 So. 3d 1232 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)