Oliva v. Christiana Trust

275 So. 3d 774
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 26, 2019
DocketNo. 3D18-2301
StatusPublished

This text of 275 So. 3d 774 (Oliva v. Christiana Trust) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Oliva v. Christiana Trust, 275 So. 3d 774 (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See § 45.031, Fla. Stat. (2018) ; IndyMac Fed. Bank FSB v. Hagan, 104 So. 3d 1232, 1236 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) (holding: "Florida case law is clear that the substance of an objection to a foreclosure sale under section 45.031(5) must be directed toward conduct that occurred at, or which related to, the foreclosure sale itself"); Mody v. Cal. Fed. Bank, 747 So. 2d 1016, 1017-18 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) (holding: "In order to vacate a foreclosure sale, the trial court must find: (1) that the foreclosure sale bid was grossly or startlingly inadequate; and (2) that the inadequacy of the bid resulted from some mistake, fraud or other irregularity in the sale.")

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mody v. California Federal Bank
747 So. 2d 1016 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Indymac Federal Bank FSB v. Hagan
104 So. 3d 1232 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
275 So. 3d 774, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oliva-v-christiana-trust-fladistctapp-2019.