Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Oliphant v. State

Oliphant v. State

983 So. 2d 16, 2008 WL 876653
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Oliphant v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 4775 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 3, 2008·No. 1D07-4151·Published

Opinion

983 So.2d 16 (2008)

Rashad S. OLIPHANT, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida or John Rutherford, Sheriff, Respondents.

No. 1D07-4151.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 3, 2008.
Rehearing Denied June 12, 2008.

*17 Rashad S. Oliphant, pro se, Petitioner.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus or prohibition is denied as moot.

PADOVANO, LEWIS, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oliphant v. State, 983 So. 2d 16, 2008 WL 876653 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

983 So. 2d 16 (Oliphant v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Oliphant v. State
983 So. 2d 16 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)