Olin v. Town of North Hempstead

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Olin v. Town of North Hempstead

18 A.D.2d 831, 237 N.Y.S.2d 991, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4651

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 21, 1963

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 18 A.D.2d 831 (Olin v. Town of North Hempstead) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Olin v. Town of North Hempstead, 18 A.D.2d 831, 237 N.Y.S.2d 991, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4651 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

In three consolidated actions (Action No. 1 being by six taxpayers of the defendant Town of North Hempstead; Action No. 2 being by the Incorporated Village of Roslyn Harbor; and Action No. 3 being by the Incorporated Village of Roslyn) to enjoin the construction of a municipal underwater incinerator in Hempstead Harbor by the defendants, the Town of North Hempstead and its named officials, and for other relief, the parties cross-appeal as follows from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered June 20, 1962 after a nonjury trial, upon the decision and opinion of the court (34 Mise 2d 853): (1) Plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their joint brief, from so much of the judgment: (a) as dismissed the first, sixth and seventh causes of action pleaded in Action No. 1; and (b) as dismissed the complaints in Actions Nos. 2 and 3. (2) Defendants appeal from so much of the judgment as, upon the third cause of action pleaded in Action No. 1, enjoined them, conditionally, from constructing the incinerator in Hempstead Harbor. Judgment, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, without costs. No opinion. (For prior appeals to this court in the first action, see 11 A D 2d 797; 13 A D 2d 996.) Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In three consolidated actions (Action No. 1 being by six taxpayers of the defendant Town of North Hempstead; Action No. 2 being by the Incorporated Village of Roslyn Harbor; and Action No. 3 being by the Incorporated Village of Roslyn) to enjoin the construction of a municipal underwater incinerator in Hempstead Harbor by the defendants, the Town of North Hempstead and its named officials, and for other relief, the parties cross-appeal as follows from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered June 20, 1962 after a nonjury trial, upon the decision and opinion of the court (34 Mise 2d 853): (1) Plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their joint brief, from so much of the judgment: (a) as dismissed the first, sixth and seventh causes of action pleaded in Action No. 1; and (b) as dismissed the complaints in Actions Nos. 2 and 3. (2) Defendants appeal from so much of the judgment as, upon the third cause of action pleaded in Action No. 1, enjoined them, conditionally, from constructing the incinerator in Hempstead Harbor. Judgment, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, without costs. No opinion. (For prior appeals to this court in the first action, see 11 A D 2d 797; 13 A D 2d 996.) Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 A.D.2d 831, 237 N.Y.S.2d 991, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4651, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/olin-v-town-of-north-hempstead-nyappdiv-1963.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack