Olic v. Pappas

47 A.D.3d 780, 849 N.Y.S.2d 174
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 22, 2008
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 47 A.D.3d 780 (Olic v. Pappas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Olic v. Pappas, 47 A.D.3d 780, 849 N.Y.S.2d 174 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rosengarten, J.), dated September 21, 2006, which granted the motion of the defendants Gus G. Pappas and Nicholas T. Pappas and the separate motion of the defendants Louis Klarevas, Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group, Inc., and Dollar Rent a Car, Inc., for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint are denied.

The evidence which the defendants submitted in support of their motions failed to eliminate all issues of fact as to whether the plaintiff sustained a fracture of the cervical region of the spine as a result of the subject motor vehicle accident (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]). Accordingly, it is not necessary to consider the sufficiency of the plaintiff’s opposition papers (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp. 68 NY2d at 324; Wein v Amato Props., LLC, 30 AD3d 506, 508 [2006]). Mastro, J.P., Dillon, Covello and Angiolillo, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Balducci v. Velasquez
92 A.D.3d 626 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Poverud v. Kwartler
90 A.D.3d 729 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Brourman v. Gorokhovsky
89 A.D.3d 660 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Gittens v. City of New York
72 A.D.3d 639 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
47 A.D.3d 780, 849 N.Y.S.2d 174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/olic-v-pappas-nyappdiv-2008.