Olga Paz v. Eric H. Holder Jr.
This text of 420 F. App'x 726 (Olga Paz v. Eric H. Holder Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Laura Reyes-Ortiz, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying her motion to reopen deportation proceedings conducted in absentia. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. Lara-Torres v. Ashcroft, 383 F.3d 968, 972 (9th Cir.2004), amended by 404 F.3d 1105 (9th Cir.2005). We deny the petition for review.
The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying Reyes-Ortiz’s motion to reopen based on lack of notice where the record *727 establishes that she was personally served with an Order to Show Cause (“OSC”) and Notice of Hearing, written in both English and Spanish. There was no statutory requirement that the OSC be orally translated. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252b(a)(2), (3) (1995); see also Matter of Hernandez, 21 I. & N. Dec. 224, 226-27 (BIA 1996).
Reyes-Ortiz’s remaining contentions are unavailing.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
420 F. App'x 726, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/olga-paz-v-eric-h-holder-jr-ca9-2011.