Olevia Davis v. State of Mississippi;

CourtCourt of Appeals of Mississippi
DecidedJanuary 7, 2020
DocketNO. 2019-KA-00213-COA
StatusPublished

This text of Olevia Davis v. State of Mississippi; (Olevia Davis v. State of Mississippi;) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Mississippi primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Olevia Davis v. State of Mississippi;, (Mich. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

NO. 2019-KA-00213-COA

OLEVIA DAVIS APPELLANT

v.

STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

DATE OF JUDGMENT: 01/10/2019 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. LAWRENCE PAUL BOURGEOIS JR. COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: HARRISON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: OFFICE OF STATE PUBLIC DEFENDER BY: GEORGE T. HOLMES MOLLIE MARIE McMILLIN ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE: OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: BARBARA WAKELAND BYRD DISTRICT ATTORNEY: JOEL SMITH NATURE OF THE CASE: CRIMINAL - FELONY DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED - 01/07/2020 MOTION FOR REHEARING FILED: MANDATE ISSUED:

BEFORE CARLTON, P.J., WESTBROOKS AND McCARTY, JJ.

McCARTY, J., FOR THE COURT:

¶1. Olevia Davis was convicted of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. He was

sentenced as a habitual offender to serve eight years in the custody of the Mississippi

Department of Corrections. Finding no arguable issues for appeal, Davis’s appellate counsel

filed a brief pursuant to Lindsey v. State, 939 So. 2d 743 (Miss. 2005). Davis was given

additional time to file a supplemental brief but did not.

FACTS

¶2. While at the Elks Lodge in Biloxi, Mississippi, for a dance contest, Davis had an altercation with another patron. Gerrell Elzy, the security guard at the Lodge, did not witness

the beginning of the altercation but did see Davis charge another man while brandishing a

broken bottle. After attempting to calm Davis, Elzy removed him from the premises.

Outside, Elzy witnessed Davis arguing again with the same man from inside the Lodge. Elzy

heard Davis say he would be back and then saw him walk across nearby railroad tracks. Elzy

testified that Davis returned approximately thirty minutes later holding a gun. While Elzy

was calling 911, he saw Davis fire the gun into the air. Davis left again, walking back across

the railroad tracks between two houses. Elzy, still on the phone with a 911 operator,

followed Davis.

¶3. Law enforcement officers arrived quickly, and Elzy identified Davis as the man who

had fired the gun into the air. Davis was arrested and searched but was not armed. After a

search, officers found the gun behind the house that Elzy saw Davis run behind.

¶4. Davis testified in his defense that he never had a gun and that Elzy confused him with

the man from the fight inside the Lodge.

DISCUSSION

¶5. Here, Davis’s appellate counsel complied with the requirements set forth in Lindsey.

See Lindsey, 939 So. 2d at 748 (¶18). Davis’s appellate counsel stated that they reviewed the

following: (a) the reason for the arrest and the circumstances surrounding Davis’s arrest; (b)

any possible violations of Davis’s right to counsel; (c) the entire trial transcript and contents

of the record; (d) all rulings of the trial court; (e) possible prosecutorial misconduct; (f) all

jury instructions; (g) all exhibits, whether admitted into evidence or not; (h) possible

2 misapplication of the law in sentencing; (i) the indictment and all of the pleadings in the

record; (j) any possible ineffective assistance of counsel; and (k) whether the verdict is

supported by the overwhelming weight of the evidence.

¶6. Our independent and thorough review of the record has not revealed any arguable

issues that would warrant reversal. See Taylor v. State, 162 So. 3d 780, 787 (¶18) (Miss.

2015). Accordingly, we affirm Davis’s conviction and sentence.

¶7. AFFIRMED.

BARNES, C.J., CARLTON AND J. WILSON, P.JJ., GREENLEE, WESTBROOKS, TINDELL, McDONALD, LAWRENCE AND C. WILSON, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lindsey v. State
939 So. 2d 743 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 2005)
Michael Taylor v. State of Mississippi
162 So. 3d 780 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Olevia Davis v. State of Mississippi;, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/olevia-davis-v-state-of-mississippi-missctapp-2020.