Oleson v. The Ida Campbell

D. Minnesota

Oleson v. The Ida Campbell

34 F. 432, 1888 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48

DecidedMarch 9, 1888

StatusPublished

This text of 34 F. 432 (Oleson v. The Ida Campbell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Oleson v. The Ida Campbell, 34 F. 432, 1888 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48 (mnd 1888).

Pincite

Opinion

NelsoN, J.

A libel in rem is filed by the administratrix of the deceased to enforce a marine tort. The remedy is prosecuted under the statute of the state of Minnesota, (Gen. St. p. 825, § 2.) It reads as follows:

“When death is caused by the wrongful act or omission of any party, the personal representatives of the deceased may maintain an action, if he might have maintained an action, had he lived, for an injury caused by the same act or omission, ” etc.

An answer and claim are interposed, and it is insisted that the statute gives this court in admiralty no jurisdiction. It is true that a remedy can be enforced in admiralty for a marine tort, if the injured party survived, but in case of death from such a tort the action does not survive in admiralty. It is therefore a disputed and unsettled question whether or not a state statute,'like the one cited, is applicable in such case to authorize an action in admiralty by the representatives. Elaborate views pro and con have been expressed by eminent judges. Without referring to them in extenso, I shall follow the expression of opinion denying the jurisdiction of a court of admiralty to entertain such an action under the statute. Decree ordered dismissing libel.

In the admiralty suit in personam of Annie Oleson, Adm'x, etc., v. Peter F. Ritchie, owner of steam-boat Ida Campbell, a decree dismissing libel is also ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NelsoN, J.

A libel in rem is filed by the administratrix of the deceased to enforce a marine tort. The remedy is prosecuted under the statute of the state of Minnesota, (Gen. St. p. 825, § 2.) It reads as follows:

“When death is caused by the wrongful act or omission of any party, the personal representatives of the deceased may maintain an action, if he might have maintained an action, had he lived, for an injury caused by the same act or omission, ” etc.

An answer and claim are interposed, and it is insisted that the statute gives this court in admiralty no jurisdiction. It is true that a remedy can be enforced in admiralty for a marine tort, if the injured party survived, but in case of death from such a tort the action does not survive in admiralty. It is therefore a disputed and unsettled question whether or not a state statute,'like the one cited, is applicable in such case to authorize an action in admiralty by the representatives. Elaborate views pro and con have been expressed by eminent judges. Without referring to them in extenso, I shall follow the expression of opinion denying the jurisdiction of a court of admiralty to entertain such an action under the statute. Decree ordered dismissing libel.

In the admiralty suit in personam of Annie Oleson, Adm'x, etc., v. Peter F. Ritchie, owner of steam-boat Ida Campbell, a decree dismissing libel is also ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 F. 432, 1888 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oleson-v-the-ida-campbell-mnd-1888.