Oleksa v. English

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Oleksa v. English

10 A.D.2d 725, 199 N.Y.S.2d 447, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11133

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 21, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 10 A.D.2d 725 (Oleksa v. English) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Oleksa v. English, 10 A.D.2d 725, 199 N.Y.S.2d 447, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11133 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the appeal is from a judgment of the City Court of Yonkers, entered upon a jury’s verdict, in favor of respondent. Appellants’ brief is limited to the contention that the trial court should have granted appellants’ motion to strike out testimony relating to a subsequent injury suffered by respondent. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Beldoek, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the appeal is from a judgment of the City Court of Yonkers, entered upon a jury’s verdict, in favor of respondent. Appellants’ brief is limited to the contention that the trial court should have granted appellants’ motion to strike out testimony relating to a subsequent injury suffered by respondent. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Beldoek, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 A.D.2d 725, 199 N.Y.S.2d 447, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oleksa-v-english-nyappdiv-1960.