Oleck v. Gauthier

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Oleck v. Gauthier

194 Misc. 80, 88 N.Y.S.2d 229, 1948 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3951

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedDecember 30, 1948

StatusPublished

This text of 194 Misc. 80 (Oleck v. Gauthier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Oleck v. Gauthier, 194 Misc. 80, 88 N.Y.S.2d 229, 1948 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3951 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1948).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff failed to prove a prima facie case. The evidence does not establish the distribution of 20,000 copies of his “Classified Directory” to “selected Home Owners located in the five Boros of New York City,” as agreed.

The judgment and order should be unanimously reversed upon the law, and new trial granted, with $30 costs to defendants to abide the event.

Steinbrink, Rubenstein and Colden, JJ., concur.

Judgment and order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff failed to prove a prima facie case. The evidence does not establish the distribution of 20,000 copies of his “Classified Directory” to “selected Home Owners located in the five Boros of New York City,” as agreed.

The judgment and order should be unanimously reversed upon the law, and new trial granted, with $30 costs to defendants to abide the event.

Steinbrink, Rubenstein and Colden, JJ., concur.

Judgment and order reversed, etc.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

194 Misc. 80, 88 N.Y.S.2d 229, 1948 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3951, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oleck-v-gauthier-nyappterm-1948.