O'Leary v. Greenport Fire Department

276 A.D.2d 539, 714 N.Y.S.2d 451
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 10, 2000
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 276 A.D.2d 539 (O'Leary v. Greenport Fire Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
O'Leary v. Greenport Fire Department, 276 A.D.2d 539, 714 N.Y.S.2d 451 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

In related actions, inter"alia, to recover damages for wrongful death, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.), entered August 11, 1999, as, upon the granting of the motion of the defendants Greenport Fire Department, Village of Green-port, and County of Suffolk for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them in Action No. 1, is in favor of the defendants Greenport Fire Department and Village of Greenport and against them, dismissing the complaint in that action insofar as asserted against those defendants.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiffs’ contentions, they failed to demonstrate the existence of any genuine issue of fact to rebut the respondents’ prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. Pursuant to Public Health Law § 3013 (1), the respondents could be held liable only if their emergency medical technicians were grossly negligent in rendering emergency medical assistance to the plaintiffs’ decedent (see, Rider v Gaslight Tavern Corp., 125 AD2d 144; Woody v Astoria Gen. Hosp., 264 AD2d 318). The plaintiffs failed to come forward with any persuasive evidence to support the claim of gross negligence (see, Amsler v Verrilli, 119 AD2d 786). Moreover, the plaintiffs failed to plead gross negligence, and never sought [540]*540leave to amend the complaint (see, Ciriello v Virgues, 156 AD2d 417; Lotito v Lund, 129 AD2d 776).

The plaintiffs’ remaining contentions are without merit. Bracken, J. P., Thompson, S. Miller and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Estate of Klinger v. Corona Community Ambulance Corps., Inc.
301 A.D.2d 495 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
276 A.D.2d 539, 714 N.Y.S.2d 451, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oleary-v-greenport-fire-department-nyappdiv-2000.