O'Leary v. Board of Education

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

O'Leary v. Board of Education

79 N.Y.S. 806

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 9, 1903

StatusPublished

This text of 79 N.Y.S. 806 (O'Leary v. Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

O'Leary v. Board of Education, 79 N.Y.S. 806 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

GOODRICH, P. J.

The only fact which distinguishes this appeal from that in Cusack v. Board, 79 N. Y. Supp. 803, is that the petitioner, who is principal of grammar school No. 5, not having been appointed as principal of one of the evening high schools, has been appointed to and accepted the position of principal of an evening elementary school, whereby his salary has been reduced from $7 to $5 per night. This proceeding was commenced July 15, 1902, after the appointment of the principals of the four evening high schools. The appointment of the petitioner as principal of the elementary school was made December 8, 1901. He was illegally removed from the position of principal of an evening high school, and his acceptance of the other position and the performance of its duties cannot defeat his right to contend against such removal.

The order should be reversed, and a peremptory writ granted for the reinstatement of the petitioner.

Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and peremptory writ of mandamus granted for the reinstatement of the applicant. All concur, BARTLETT, J., in result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GOODRICH, P. J.

The only fact which distinguishes this appeal from that in Cusack v. Board, 79 N. Y. Supp. 803, is that the petitioner, who is principal of grammar school No. 5, not having been appointed as principal of one of the evening high schools, has been appointed to and accepted the position of principal of an evening elementary school, whereby his salary has been reduced from $7 to $5 per night. This proceeding was commenced July 15, 1902, after the appointment of the principals of the four evening high schools. The appointment of the petitioner as principal of the elementary school was made December 8, 1901. He was illegally removed from the position of principal of an evening high school, and his acceptance of the other position and the performance of its duties cannot defeat his right to contend against such removal.

The order should be reversed, and a peremptory writ granted for the reinstatement of the petitioner.

Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and peremptory writ of mandamus granted for the reinstatement of the applicant. All concur, BARTLETT, J., in result.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

79 N.Y.S. 806, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oleary-v-board-of-education-nyappdiv-1903.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack