Olds v. State

97 Ala. 81
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided July 1, 1892·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

HARALSON, J.

— In Donohoo v. State, 36 Ala. 281, we held, that getting into and descending the chimney of a house, with intent to steal, is a sufficient breaking and entering to constitute burglary, although the party does not enter the room of the house, below. And such was the ruling of this court in Walker v. State, 52 Ala. 376, though in the latter case, the party entered into the house by going down the chimney. Such a breaking is an actual one, as much so as the forcible breaking by any other means. 3 Gr. Ev. § 76.

On the foregoing authorities, this case must be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Olds v. State, 97 Ala. 81 (Ala. 1892).

97 Ala. 81 (Olds v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Creel v. State
301 So. 2d 267 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1974)
Miller v. State
187 So. 2d 51 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)
State v. Pigques
310 S.W.2d 942 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1958)
State v. Hart
77 S.E. 862 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1913)
Pressley v. State
111 Ala. 34 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1895)