Olds v. Alvord

183 So. 711, 133 Fla. 221
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided March 29, 1938·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

In this cause Mr. Chief Justice ELLIS, Mr. Justice TERRELL and Mr. Justice CHAPMAN are of the *Page 222 opinion that the decree of the Circuit Court should be affirmed, while Mr. Justice WHITFIELD, Mr. Justice BROWN and Mr. Justice BUFORD are of the opinion that the decree should be reversed. When the members of the Supreme Court, sitting six members in a body and after full consultation, it appears that the members of the Court are permanently and equally divided in opinion as to whether the said decree should be affirmed or reversed, and there is no prospect of an immediate change in the personnel of the Court, the decree should be affirmed; therefore, it is considered, ordered and adjudged under the authority of State, exrel. Hampton, v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 So. R. 51, that the decree of the Circuit Court in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

ELLIS, C.J., and WHITFIELD, TERRELL, BROWN, BUFORD and CHAPMAN, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Olds v. Alvord, 183 So. 711, 133 Fla. 221 (Fla. 1938).

183 So. 711 (Olds v. Alvord) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brownell v. City of St. Petersburg
128 F.2d 721 (Fifth Circuit, 1942)