Olds-Oakland Co. v. Rountree

89 S.E. 594, 18 Ga. App. 492, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 1043
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 29, 1916·No. 7086·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Wade, C. J.

1. The question involved in the trial of this case in the lower court was as to the nature and character of the contract of employment between the plaintiff and the defendant, under and by virtue of which the account sued upon accrued. The trial judge properly submitted the issues involved for determination by the jury, and there is no merit in the exceptions to various portions of his charge, of in the assignments of error based upon his refusal of several written requests to charge.

2. The evidence sufficiently supported the verdict, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Olds-Oakland Co. v. Rountree, 89 S.E. 594, 18 Ga. App. 492, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 1043 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

89 S.E. 594 (Olds-Oakland Co. v. Rountree) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Edmonds v. Atlanta Newspapers, Inc.
87 S.E.2d 415 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1955)
City of Quitman v. Elder
190 S.E. 445 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1937)
Georgia Power Co. v. Puckett
179 S.E. 284 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)
Jackson v. Atlanta Goodwill Industries Inc.
167 S.E. 702 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)
Carter v. Spiegel, May Stern Co.
166 S.E. 34 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1932)
Culbreath v. Kutz Co.
140 S.E. 419 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1927)
Dollar v. City of Thomasville
101 S.E. 314 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)
Columbus Power Co. v. Puckett
100 S.E. 800 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)
City of Dawson v. Smith
90 S.E. 76 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)